Mastering Scientific Concepts and Content
MAY 16, 2024
The Next-Generation Science Standards (NGSS) are divided into three areas: Core Ideas (discipline-specific knowledge), Practices and Cross-Cutting Concepts. Last month, in Thinking Like a Scientist, we discussed how Thinking Maps can support the development of scientific practices, including critical and creative thinking, collaboration and communication, and applying modeling and mathematics. However, scientific thinking must also include a solid grounding in content-area knowledge and general scientific concepts. Thinking Maps can help here, too.
What Are Cross-Cutting Concepts?
Cross-cutting concepts are big ideas that help students make sense of scientific information across disciplines. These concepts provide a framework that unifies different scientific disciplines, making learning more integrated and meaningful. They include seven key themes that apply universally:
- Patterns: Noticing patterns helps to identify trends (like animal migration routes or repeating weather patterns), relationships, and similarities and differences between phenomena.
- Cause and Effect: By understanding the relationship between actions and outcomes, students can predict consequences, such as the effects of pollution on ecosystems.
- Scale, Proportion, and Quantity: Students grasp the importance of measurements, helping them understand concepts ranging from microscopic cells to astronomical distances.
- Systems and System Models: Viewing natural and engineered systems allows students to see how parts work together, like the water cycle or a car engine.
- Energy and Matter: Students understand that energy and matter are conserved and transferred in ecosystems, chemical reactions, and machines.
- Structure and Function: Recognizing that the form of an organism or object suits its function, like bird beaks adapted to specific food sources.
- Stability and Change: Identifying consistent patterns and shifts over time helps students predict natural phenomena or technological changes.
Thinking Maps are well suited to these types of thinking. In fact, many of them correlate directly to these cross-cutting concepts.
Patterns
There are many kinds of patterns, each of which can be expressed with different types of Thinking Maps. The Double Bubble Map allows students to explore patterns in terms of similarities and differences.
Cause and Effect
The Multi-Flow Map is all about cause-and-effect thinking.
Scale, Proportion and Quantity
This Bridge Map is a great way to help students visualize proportions and quantities.
Systems and System Models
Systems and models require an understanding of part-to-whole relationships, which can be expressed in a Brace Map.
Other types of systems, like the water cycle, may be better expressed as a Flow Map.
Energy and Matter
Students can use a Tree Map to classify states of matter and forms of energy.
Transformations can be expressed using a Flow Map.
Structure and Function
The Brace Map can be used to explore structure and function in terms of Part-to-Whole relationships.
This Flow Map was used to explore hierarchies of body systems.
Stability and Change
This Bridge Map is a great way to explore change.
A Flow Map might be used to show the sequence of changes.
Core Ideas: The Basis for Scientific Understanding
In the NGSS, Core Ideas refer to the fundamental scientific principles that students should understand within four specific domains: Physical Sciences, Life Sciences, Earth and Space Sciences, and Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science. These ideas form the foundational knowledge for students, enabling them to explore more complex scientific concepts as they progress through their education. Having a solid understanding of basic scientific principles is essential for making informed decisions in a world where science and technology play significant roles in our daily lives. Building a strong foundation of scientific knowledge also prepares students for more advanced study after high school and opens up new career possibilities.
Thinking Maps can be used to help students visualize and understand complex scientific concepts at all grade levels, from PreK all the way to graduate school. They are flexible frameworks for thinking that can be applied to virtually any topic and combined to support more comprehensive exploration and understanding of complex relationships and processes. Using Thinking Maps to take notes, organize ideas and share information helps make scientific information concrete and understandable. That translates to higher levels of comprehension, retention and recall of scientific facts.
Thinking Maps can be used to advance understanding of scientific concepts from PreK to high school…and far beyond. Many students continue to use Thinking Maps as a study and organizational aid well into grad school and in their professional lives.
Want to learn more about Thinking Maps and STEM?
Join our webinar: Building a Deep Structure for Scientific Thinking.
Continue Reading
August 16, 2024
Artificial intelligence (AI) models like ChatGPT and Gemini are profoundly changing the way people interact with technology, information, and each other. Are they also changing the way we think? We must help our students avoid the temptation of outsourcing their critical thinking to AI.
June 17, 2024
To understand contemporary issues and participate fully in civic life, students need a solid grounding not only in basic facts, but also in essential critical thinking skills. Thinking Maps can help students develop the thinking skills they need to ask relevant questions, detect bias and misinformation, connect past and current events, and understand the changing world around them.
April 15, 2024
Scientific thinking empowers students to ask good questions about the world around them, become flexible and adaptable problem solvers, and engage in effective decision making in a variety of domains. Thinking Maps can help teachers nurture a scientific mindset in students and support mastery of important STEM skills and content.
February 15, 2024
A majority of teachers believe that students are finally catching up from pandemic learning losses. But those gains are far from evenly distributed—and too many students were already behind before the pandemic. To close these achievement gaps, schools and districts need to focus on the underlying issue: the critical thinking gap.