Results
Hundreds of schools across the country and internationally are accelerating learning with Thinking Maps. In fact, an independent third-party study showed that schools using Thinking Maps are roughly twice as likely to exceed average growth rates for their district. And when you look at the individual results of our users, the data is clear: schools who use Thinking Maps with fidelity improve learning outcomes.
The Research
Brain-Based Strategies. Implementation Excellence. Proven Results.
In 2019, a third-party correlational study compared student achievement results for elementary and middle schools using Thinking Maps to district averages. The results were meaningful and significant and show that schools using Thinking Maps were roughly 2 times more likely to surpass average growth rates for their districts than schools not using Thinking Maps. Meets ESSA standards for Tier 2 Research.
- Schools using Thinking Maps were 2.0x more likely to surpass average district growth rates in Reading.
- Schools using Thinking Maps were 2.7x more likely to surpass average district growth rates in Math.